QONUN IJODKORLIGI JARAYONIDA LOBBIZMNI TARTIBGA SOLISHNING SIYOSIY-HUQUQIY ZARURIYATI

##article.authors##

##semicolon##

lobbizm, qonun ijodkorligi jarayoni, siyosiy-huquqiy islohot, manfaatdor guruhlar, shaffoflik, huquqiy siyosat

##article.abstract##

Maqolada shaffoflik, hisobdorlik va davlat siyosatiga ta’sir ko‘rsatishga teng imkoniyatni ta’minlah maqsadida qonun ijodkorligi jarayonida lobbichilik faoliyatini tartibga solishning siyosiy va huquqiy zaruriyati ko‘rib chiqiladi. AQSh, Kanada, Yevropa Ittifoqi, Latviya va Polsha qonunchiligi va ilmiy adabiyotlarining qiyosiy tahlili asosida lobbizm, agar u qonuniy jihatdan to‘g‘ri rasmiylashtirilgan bo‘lsa, korrupsion ta’sir ko‘rsatish shakli emas, balki manfaatlarni ifodalashning qonuniy vositasi bo‘lishi mumkinligi ko‘rsatilgan. Tadqiqotda qiyosiy-huquqiy, tahliliy va tizimli-tuzilmaviy yondashuvlardan foydalangan holda muallif O‘zbekistonning zamonaviy qonunchilik amaliyotini baholaydi va tartibga solinmagan lobbichilik xavfini aniqlaydi. “Lobbichilik faoliyati to‘g‘risida”gi qonunning qabul qilinishi davlat organlarining manfaatdor guruhlar bilan shaffof hamkorligini ta’minlash, manfaatlar to‘qnashuvining oldini olish, qonun ustuvorligi prinsipini mustahkamlashda institutsional asos bo‘lib xizmat qiladi. Olingan natijalar milliy huquqiy tizimni modernizatsiya qilish va aholining demokratik boshqaruvga bo‘lgan ishonchini oshirishga xizmat qiladi.

##plugins.themes.default.displayStats.downloads##

##plugins.themes.default.displayStats.noStats##

##submission.authorBiography##

  • Eshturdiyeva Farangiz Baxodir qizi

    O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidenti huzuridagi Qonunchilik va huquqiy siyosat instituti tayanch doktoranti

##submission.citations##

Agency for Information and Mass Communications. (2022). Parliamentary Discussion on Advertising Law. Tashkent.

Bennedsen, M., & Feldmann, S. (2003) Lobbying and Legislative Organization: The Effect of the Vote of Confidence Procedure. Business and Politics, 4.

Committee of the Oliy Majlis. (2023). Land Code (Revision) and Law on Advertising – Parliamentary Debate Records. Tashkent.

De Bruycker, I., & Beyers, J. (2018) Lobbying Strategies and Success: Inside and Outside Lobbying in EU Legislative Politics. European Political Science Review, 11, 1–18.

European Union. (2021). Joint Transparency Register. Brussels.

Government of Canada. (2008). Lobbying Act, R.S., c. 44. Ottawa.

Institute of Legislation and Legal Policy. (2022). Analytical Report on Public Consultations in Uzbekistan. Tashkent.

Khakimov, O. (2020). Public Councils and Expert Engagement in Uzbek Legislation. Journal of Legal Reforms, 3, 45–57.

OECD. (2022). Principles for Transparency and Integrity in Lobbying. Paris.

OECD. (2010). Recommendation on Principles for Transparency and Integrity in Lobbying. Paris.

OECD. (2022). Transparency and Integrity in Lobbying. Paris, p. 5.

Republic of Latvia. (2018). Law on Transparency of Interest Representation. Riga.

Republic of Poland. (2005). Law on Lobbying in the Law-Making Process. Warsaw.

Regulation.gov.uz. (2023). Summary Report on Public Consultations for the Land Code. Tashkent.

Sukhareva, A. Ya. (2008). Bolshoy yuridicheskiy slovar [Large Legal Dictionary]. 3rd ed. (p. 377). Moscow: INFRA-M Publ.

Truman, D. (1951). The Governmental Process: Political Interests and Public Opinion. New York: Knopf.

Transparency International. (2024.) Corruption Perceptions Index 2023. Berlin.

United States Congress. (1995). Lobbying Disclosure Act, Public Law (pp. 104–65). Washington D.C.

UNDP. (2021). Participatory Governance and Law-Making in Transition States. New York.

World Bank. (2021). Regulatory Impact Assessment: Good Practices for Developing Economies. Washington D.C.

##submission.downloads##

##submissions.published##

2026-01-08

##issue.issue##

##section.section##

12.00.01 – Davlat va huquq nazariyasi va tarixi. Huquqiy ta’limotlar tarixi.