EKSPERT XULOSASINING ISBOTLASH VOSITASI SIFATIDAGI O‘RNI VA AHAMIYATI
##semicolon##
ekspert xulosasi, sud ekspertizasi, isbotlash vositasi, jinoyat-protsessi, maqbullik, aloqadorlik, ishonchlilik, yetarlilik##article.abstract##
Mazkur maqolada ekspert xulosasining jinoyat-protsessual isbotlash vositasi sifatidagi o‘rni va ahamiyati kompleks tadqiq etildi. Unda ekspert xulosasining huquqiy tabiati, uning guvoh ko‘rsatmalari, mutaxassis fikri hamda ashyoviy dalillardan farqli jihatlari tahlil qilindi. Ekspert xulosasining maqbulligi, aloqadorligi, ishonchliligi va yetarliligi uni dalil sifatida baholashning asosiy mezonlari sifatida yoritildi. Shuningdek, ekspert xulosasining sud va tergov organlari uchun oldindan belgilangan majburiy kuchga ega emasligi, uni boshqa dalillar bilan birgalikda xolisona baholash zarurligi asoslab berildi. Tadqiqotda ekspert xulosasining ilmiy-metodologik asoslanganligini ta’minlash, ekspert vakolatlarining huquqiy chegaralarini belgilash, ekspert oldiga huquqiy tusdagi savollar qo‘yilishini taqiqlash hamda ekspertiza metodikalarini validatsiyadan o‘tkazish masalalari ko‘rib chiqilgan. Muallif tomonidan O‘zbekiston Respublikasining jinoyat-protsessual qonunchiligini takomillashtirishga qaratilgan ilmiy-amaliy takliflar ilgari surilgan.
##plugins.themes.default.displayStats.downloads##
##submission.citations##
Abduvahobov, Sh. A. (2024). Jinoyat protsessi ishtirokchisi sifatida mutaxassis va unga qo‘yiladigan talablar [The specialist as a participant in criminal proceedings and the requirements imposed on them]. Forensic Expertise of Uzbekistan, (1), 63–66.
Bababekov, N. D. (2024). Maxsus bilimlar haqida fan – sud ekspertshunosligi: Tushunchasi, mazmuni va tuzilishi [Forensic expertology as a science of specialized knowledge: Concept, content, and structure]. Scientific and Practical Journal of Public Safety, 2 (10), 95–105.
Eshmuratov, Sh. B. (2023). Ekspert xulosasining dalil manbai sifatidagi tuzilishi, mazmuni va uni baholash [Structure and content of an expert opinion as a source of evidence and its evaluation]. IQRO Journal, 4(2), 131–142.
Eshnazarov, M. (2026). Jinoyat ishlarini tergov qilishda ekspert xulosasining maqbulligini baholash masalalari [Issues of evaluating the admissibility of expert opinions in the investigation of criminal cases]. Sociology and Law, (1), 12–18.
Faigman, D. L., Kaye, D. H., Saks, M. J., & Mnookin, J. L. (2002). Modern scientific evidence: The law and science of expert testimony. West Publishing.
Möllers, C., Salemi, A., & Schliwinski, S. (2024). Die Stellung des Sachverständigen im deutschen Strafprozess [The position of the expert in German criminal proceedings]. Hamburg Legal Notes, (1), 45–58.
Nabiyev, G‘. (2026). Jinoyat protsessida ekspert vakolatlarining huquqiy chegaralari va ularni qonunchilikda mustahkamlash masalalari [Legal boundaries of expert powers in criminal proceedings and issues of their legislative consolidation]. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 1(12), 67–74.
Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2014, May 23). On the court judgment (Resolution No. 07). Lex.uz. https://lex.uz/docs/2413562
Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2018, August 24). On certain issues of application of the norms of criminal procedural legislation relating to the admissibility of evidence (Resolution No. 24). Lex.uz. https://lex.uz/docs/-3895986
Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2019, May 24). On the court decision (Resolution No. 12). Lex.uz. https://lex.uz/ru/docs/-4396483
President of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2025, September 8). On measures to further improve forensic expert activity and widely introduce modern technologies in the field (Resolution No. RP-270). Lex.uz. https://lex.uz/uz/docs/7717938
Republic of Uzbekistan. (1994, September 22). Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan. Lex.uz. https://lex.uz/docs/-111460
Republic of Uzbekistan. (2010, June 1). On forensic examination (Law No. LRU-249). Lex.uz. https://lex.uz/docs/1633102
Republic of Uzbekistan. (2026). On forensic expert activity (Law No. LRU-1152). Lex.uz. https://lex.uz/docs/-8265035
Rossinskaya, E. R. (2018). Sudebnaya ekspertiza v grazhdanskom, arbitrazhnom, administrativnom i ugolovnom protsesse [Forensic examination in civil, commercial, administrative, and criminal proceedings] (4th ed.). Norma.
Sobirov, F. B. (2026). Sud ekspertizasi xulosalarini baholash amaliyoti [Practice of evaluating forensic expert opinions]. Central Asian Journal of Academic Research, 4(2), 140–143.
To‘laganova, G. Z. (2021). Jinoyat-protsessual huquqi [Criminal procedural law]. Bukhara Law College.
