SEP LITSENZIYALASHDA FRAND MAJBURIYATLARI: GLOBAL SUD AMALIYOTI VA OʻZBEKISTON RESPUBLIKASI UCHUN HUQUQIY BOʻSHLIQ
##semicolon##
standart uchun muhim patentlar (SEP), FRAND majburiyati, SEP litsenziyalash, antimonopol huquq, global litsenziya to‘lovi, sud yurisdiksiyasi, intellektual mulk, Oʻzbekiston patent huquqi##article.abstract##
Maqolada standart uchun muhim patentlar (standard-essential patents, SEP) sohasida FRAND (fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory – adolatli, oqilona va kamsitilmaydigan) majburiyatlarining huquqiy tabiati va amaliy samaradorligi tahlil qilingan. Tadqiqotning maqsadi yetakchi yurisdiksiyalar sud amaliyotini tahlil qilish asosida FRAND mexanizmining samaradorligini aniqlash, shuningdek, uni Oʻzbekiston Respublikasi qonunchiligida normativ jihatdan mustahkamlash istiqbollarini baholashdan iborat. Tadqiqot obyekti – yetakchi yurisdiksiyalarda (Yevropa Ittifoqi, Birlashgan Qirollik, Xitoy, Hindiston, AQSH) shakllangan sud amaliyoti, xususan, Huawei v. ZTE, Unwired Planet v. Huawei, Nokia v. OPPO va boshqa yirik keyslardir. Tadqiqot jarayonida qiyosiy-huquqiy va dogmatik metodlardan foydalanilgan. Natijalar shuni koʻrsatadiki, FRAND tartibi “ikki tomonlama yoʻl” sifatida shakllangan boʻlsa-da, yurisdiksiyalar oʻrtasida sezilarli tafovutlar mavjud. Xulosa o‘rnida aytish mumkinki, Oʻzbekiston qonunchiligida SEP va FRAND tushunchalarini tartibga soluvchi maxsus normalarning mavjud emasligi raqamli iqtisodiyot hamda 5G infratuzilmasini joriy etish sharoitida jiddiy huquqiy bo‘shliqni keltirib chiqaradi.
##plugins.themes.default.displayStats.downloads##
##submission.citations##
4iP Council. (2024). Huawei v ZTE – Case law analysis. https://caselaw.4ipcouncil.com/cjeu-decisions/huawei-v-zte
Bonadio, E., & Contardi, M. (2024). The EU SEP Regulation proposal: A critical assessment. European Intellectual Property Review, 46(3), 145–162.
Center for Strategic and International Studies. (2025, May 7). The new SEP powerhouse: How China is shaping global patent disputes. https://www.csis.org/blogs/perspectives-innovation/new-sep-powerhouse-how-china-shaping-global-patent-disputes
Contreras, J. L. (Ed.). (2019). The Cambridge handbook of technical standardization law: Competition, antitrust, and patents. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316416723
European Telecommunications Standards Institute. (2023). ETSI intellectual property rights policy. https://www.etsi.org/intellectual-property-rights
IAM. (2024). United States: SEPs and FRAND – Litigation, policy and latest developments. https://www.iam-media.com/hub/sepfrand-hub/2024
Karimov, S. (2022). Oʻzbekistonda intellektual mulk huquqlarini himoya qilishning huquqiy asoslari [Legal foundations of intellectual property rights protection in Uzbekistan]. Adolat.
Kluwer Patent Blog. (2025, March 31). The WTO dispute between China and EU over Chinese SEPs global rate-setting. https://patentblog.kluweriplaw.com/2025/03/31/the-wto-dispute-between-china-and-eu-over-chinese-seps-global-rate-setting/
Kühnen, T. (2025). Handbuch der Patentverletzung [Handbook of patent infringement] (17th ed.). Carl Heymanns Verlag.
Layne-Farrar, A., Padilla, A. J., & Schmalensee, R. (2007). Pricing patents for licensing in standard-setting organizations: Making sense of FRAND commitments. Antitrust Law Journal, 74(3), 671–706.
Lemley, M. A., & Shapiro, C. (2007). Patent holdup and royalty stacking. Texas Law Review, 85(7), 1991–2049. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.923468
Microsoft Corp. v. Motorola Inc., 696 F.3d 872 (9th Cir. 2012). https://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/judgments/details/2224
Picht, P. G. (2017). FRAND determination in TCL v. Ericsson and Unwired Planet v. Huawei: Same same but different? (Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition Research Paper No. 17-20). Social Science Research Network.
Republic of Uzbekistan. (2002). Law “On inventions, utility models and industrial designs” (No. 397-II). Lex.uz. https://lex.uz/uz/docs/-76671
Republic of Uzbekistan. (2012, January 6). Law “On competition” (No. LRU-319). https://lex.uz/docs/1931450
Sisvel. (2024, January 29). The Chongqing Nokia v OPPO global FRAND rate determination. https://www.sisvel.com/insights/the-chongqing-nokia-v-oppo-global-frand-rate-determination/
Treacy, P., & Lawrance, S. (2021). FRAND in numbers: A review of post-Unwired Planet decisions. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 16(4–5), 365–376. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpab036
WilmerHale. (2024, April 24). FRAND Quarterly: Navigating the Global SEP Landscape – April 2024. https://www.wilmerhale.com/en/insights/client-alerts/20240424-frand-quarterly-navigating-the-global-sep-landscape-april-2024
WilmerHale. (2025, May 14). FRAND Quarterly: Navigating the Global SEP Landscape – May 2025. https://www.wilmerhale.com/en/insights/client-alerts/20250514-frand-quarterly-navigating-the-global-sep-landscape-may-2025
