SUD-EKSPERTLIK SOHASIDA RAQAMLASHTIRISH VA ZAMONAVIY TEXNOLOGIYALARDAN FOYDALANISH
##semicolon##
raqamlashtirish, sunʼiy intellekt, raqamli dalillar, elektron maʼlumotlar bazalari, “E-ekspertiza” elektron platformasi, raqamli kriminalistika, elektron ekspertiza, institutsional islohotlar##article.abstract##
Maqolada Oʻzbekiston Respublikasida sud ekspertlik faoliyatini modernizatsiya qilishga qaratilgan islohotlar, ularning huquqiy asoslari, sud-ekspertlik faoliyatini raqamlashtirish jarayonlari hamda amaliyotdagi asosiy muammolarning ilmiy tahlili keltirilgan. Xorijiy davlatlarda sud-ekspertlik faoliyatini raqamlashtirish huquqiy tizimlar taraqqiyotining ustuvor yoʻnalishi hamda odil sudlov samaradorligini oshirishning muhim omili sifatida koʻrilmoqda. Bu anʼanaviy qogʻoz aylanmasidan elektron axborot tizimlariga oʻtishni nazarda tutadi va muhim oʻzgarishlarga olib keladi. Muallif sud-ekspertlik tizimining global tendensiyalar bilan uygʻunlikda rivojlanishi va faoliyatni raqamlashtirish odil sudlov samaradorligini oshirishning muhim omili ekanini ilmiy jihatdan asoslab bergan. Tadqiqot yakunida mazkur yoʻnalishni yanada takomillashtirish uchun oʻz takliflarini ilgari surgan.
##plugins.themes.default.displayStats.downloads##
##submission.citations##
1. Abdurahmonov, I. I. (2021). Sud-ekspertlik faoliyatida zamonaviy texnologiyalar [Modern technologies in forensic activities] (pp. 112–130). Tashkent.
2. Carrier, B. (2019). Digital forensics investigation process (pp. 56–78, 143–160). Elsevier.
3. Casey, E. (2018). Digital evidence and computer crime (pp. 95–124, 201–220). Academic Press.
4. Council of Europe. (2019). Guidelines of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on electronic evidence in civil and administrative proceedings and explanatory memorandum. Council of Europe Publishing.
5. European Parliament & Council of the European Union. (2024). Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act). https://ai-act-law.eu
6. International Organization for Standardization. (2015a). Information technology — Security techniques — Guidance on assuring suitability and adequacy of incident investigation method (ISO/IEC Standard No. 27041:2015). https://www.iso.org/standard/44405.html
7. International Organization for Standardization. (2015b). Information technology — Security techniques — Guidelines for the analysis and interpretation of digital evidence (ISO/IEC Standard No. 27042:2015). https://www.iso.org/standard/44406.html
8. Japan National Police Agency. (2020). Digital forensics reports (pp. 22–45). National Police Agency.
9. Mirzayev, A., & Abdullayev, D. (2020). Sud-ekspertlik xulosalarining qonuniyligi va ishonchliligini oshirish mexanizmlari [Mechanisms for increasing the legality and reliability of forensic expert conclusions]. Scientific Application of Jurisprudence, (1), 12–21.
10. President of Uzbekistan. (2025). Presidential Decree No. RP–270 “On measures for further improving forensic expert activity and the wide introduction of modern technologies into the sphere”. https://lex.uz/uz/docs/7717938
11. Republic of Uzbekistan. (2003). Law “On informatization”. https://lex.uz/uz/docs/83472
12. Republic of Uzbekistan. (2010). Law “On the forensic examination”. https://lex.uz/uz/docs/1633102
13. Republic of Uzbekistan. (2015). Law “On the electronic government”. https://lex.uz/uz/docs/2833860
14. Republic of Uzbekistan. (2023). The Constitution of the Republic of Uzbekistan. https://lex.uz/uz/docs/-6445145
15. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2020). Handbook on digital forensics (pp. 33–58, 101–120). United Nations.
