KORRUPSION TARMOQLAR MURAKKABLIGINI O‘RGANISHNING ILMIY MODELI

##article.authors##

##semicolon##

institutsional yaxlitlik, qonun ijodkorligi jarayoni, ma’muriy mexanizmlar, byurokratik tuzilmalar, axloqiy nojo‘ya xatti-harakat

##article.abstract##

Ushbu tadqiqot korrupsiyani to‘rt o‘lchov: turlar, faoliyat yo‘nalishlari, sohalar va joylar bo‘yicha o‘rganishga mo‘ljallangan ТYSJ modelini taklif etadi. Shu bilan birga, ushbu maqolada davlat sohasidagi korrupsiyaning turli jihatlari va ko‘rinishlari, uning paydo bo‘lish sabablari, aniqlash usullari hamda institutsional yaxlitlikka xavf tug‘dirishi o‘rganilgan. Shuningdek, mazkur maqolada korrupsiyaga faqat individual xatti-harakat yoki huquqbuzarlik sifatida emas, balki siyosiy va ma’muriy tuzilmalarga asoslangan tizimli va madaniy hodisa sifatida qaralgan. Maqolada taklif etilgan ТYSJ modelini qo‘llash korrupsiyaning haqiqiy va taxmin qilinayotgan faktlarini yanada aniqroq baholash imkonini beradi, bu esa axloqsiz amaliyotlarni o‘zgartirish va davlat sektori samaradorligini oshirishga qaratilgan tegishli profilaktika va tuzatish choralarini ishlab chiqishni ta’minlaydi. Bundan tashqari, tadqiqot korrupsiya namoyon bo‘ladigan aniq qonuniyatlar, joylar va kontekstlarni aniqlashga yordam beradi, bu esa yuqori zaiflik zonalarini belgilash imkonini beradi. Empirik ma’lumotlarga asoslanib, muallif korrupsion xulq-atvorni batafsil tasniflash va chuqur tushunish umuman korrupsiyaga qarshi maqsadli va samarali strategiyalarni ishlab chiqish uchun hal qiluvchi ahamiyatga ega degan xulosaga keladi.

##plugins.themes.default.displayStats.downloads##

##plugins.themes.default.displayStats.noStats##

##submission.authorBiography##

  • Ahmadjonov Murodullo Nurali o‘g‘li

    Toshkent davlat yuridik universiteti mustaqil izlanuvchisi, Namangan viloyati Kosonsoy tuman prokurorining yordamchisi

##submission.citations##

Ahmadjonov, M. (2024). Anti-Corruption and Compliance Control: Legal Literacy among Lawyers and Law Students. International Journal of Law and Policy, 8, 52–67. https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.145

Ahmadjonov, M. (2025, March). The Impact of corruption factors in public administration. Review of law sciences, 9(11), 66–74. https://review.tsul.uz/2025/04/04/davlat-boshqaruviga-korrupsiyaviy-omillarning-tasiri/

AllahRakha, N. (2023). The impacts of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on business and its regulatory challenges. International Journal of Law and Policy, 1, 25–48. https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.23

AllahRakha, N. (2024). Global perspectives on cybercrime legislation. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 8, 106–131. https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i10.6007

Alkhodary, A., & Saidat, Z. (2023). Examining the Impact of E-Governance on the Performance of Corporations: A Case Study of Companies in Jordan. Information Sciences Letters, 26. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2021-7-5-235-242

Barrington, M. (2022). The Social Bases of Obedience and Revolt. International Journal of Law and Policy, 13, 22–35. https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.154

Carter, L. Y. (2023). Analyzing e-government design science artifacts: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Information Management, 11. 75–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt. 2021.102430D

Cardellini, L. (2023). Sovereignty beyond Borders: Unraveling the Enigma of Airspace and Outer Space Interplay. International Journal of Law and Policy, 9. https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.201

Fazekas, K. L. (2019). Perils of development funding: The tale of EU Funds and grand corruption in Central and Eastern Europe. Regulation and Governance, 17, 52–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.121

Huang, C., & Hsiao, L. (2022). Effect of Applying Case Method to Anti-Corruption Education on Learning Motivation and Learning Effectiveness. Revista de Cercetare Si Interventie Sociala, 23. https://doi.org/10.33788/rcis.73.17

Knowledgehub. (2019). Аnticоrruрtiоn Роliciеs in Gеоrgiа, Mоldоvа аnd Ukrаinе (pp. 28–35). httрs://knоwlеdgеhub.trаnsраrеncy.оrg/аssеts/uрlоаds/Аnti-cоrruрtiоnроliciеs

McAllister, J. & Pietsch, A. G. (2012). ANU poll: Perceptions of corruption and ethical conduct

(p. 7). http://politicsir.cass.anu.edu.au/polls-and-surveys/anupoll

OECD. (2023). Collusion and corruption in public procurement No. 6, pp. 103–117. https://www.oecd.org/daf/competition/46235884

Parliamentary Assembly. (2024). Promoting Integrity to Tackle Political Corruption No. 9

pp. 51–66. https://assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/XRef/Xref-XML2HTMLEN.aspfileid=23930

Salter, M. (2010). Lawful but corrupt: Gaming and the problem of institutional corruption in the private sector. Harvard Business School, 14. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1726004

Schachter, H. L. (2022). E‐participation Opportunities and the Ambiguous Role of Corruption: A Model of Municipal Responsiveness to Sociopolitical Factors. Public Administration Review, 79, 10–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13049

Yakovlev, E. Zh. (2023). State capture: From Yeltsin to Putin. CEFIR/NES Working Paper series Working Paper No. 942006. Centre for Economic and Financial Research at New Economic School, 2. http://www.cefir.ru/ezhuravskaya/research/Yakovlev_Zhuravskaya_Capture_Yeltsin_Putin.pdf

##submission.downloads##

##submissions.published##

2026-01-08

##issue.issue##

##section.section##

12.00.12 – Korrupsiya muammolari.