PROBLEMS OF DETERMINING THE STATE BELONGING OF A LEGAL ENTITY WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

Authors

Keywords:

integration, European Union, Hague Convention, Brussels Convention, rules, incorporation, real settlement, exploitation center criterion

Abstract

 This article examines the actions taken by the European Union to regulate the conflict of law norms of different states within the framework of integration in order to determine the affiliation of a legal entity that plays an important role in international private law relations. The article presents an analysis of the Hague and Brussels Conventions, which are aimed at recognizing the legal personality of a legal entity, indicating the discrepancies between the criteria of incorporation and settlement. Also, the draft rules of the European Group on Private International Law “On the Law Applicable to Companies and Other Organizations” were considered, in which the priority of the incorporation criterion and the tendency for a liberal approach were analyzed. The main obstacle in the development of drafts of international treaties on determining the affiliation of a legal entity was the different integration goals of the European Union and the different positions of the member states in national legislation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. ARC Group. (2024). European cross-border M&A landscape. https://arc-group.com/geopolitics-europe-cross-border-m-a/

2. Aukhatov, A. Ya. (2005). Opredelenie primenimogo k yuridicheskim litsam prava [Determination of the law applicable to legal entities] (Abstract of Candidate dissertation). Kyiv.

3. Biermeyer, T., & Meyer-Erdmann, M. (2021). Cross-border corporate mobility in the EU: Empirical findings. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3960618

4. Centros Ltd v Erhvervs- og Selskabsstyrelsen, C-212/97. (1999). ECR I-1459. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:61997CJ0212

5. Desarrollo Vial de los Andes S.A.C. v. Republic of Peru, ARB/20/18. (2020). https://www.italaw.com/cases/10450

6. Encavis AG and Others v. Italian Republic, ARB/20/39. (2024, March 11). https://www.italaw.com/cases/9467

7. European Communities. (1968, February 29). Convention on the mutual recognition of companies and legal persons. Bulletin of the European Communities, Supplement 2/69. [EU Commission — working document]. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/70d4adbe-e490-405f-9e7b-c0fa90baa23d/language-en

8. European Group for Private International Law (WGPIL). (2016). Draft rules on the law applicable to companies and other bodies (3rd draft). https://gedip-egpil.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Company-law-3rd-draft.pdf

9. García Olmedo, J. (2024). Mihaljević v. Croatia: Abuse of rights and nationality planning by natural persons. ICSID Review, 39(1), 42–51. https://orbilu.uni.lu/handle/10993/60503

10. Gelter, M. (2024, January 3). Minimum capital and cross-border firm formation in Europe (Law Working Paper No. 748/2024). European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI). https://www.ecgi.global/sites/default/files/working_papers/documents/minimumcapitalandcross.pdf

Hague Conference on Private International Law. (1956, June 1). Convention concerning the recognition of the legal personality of foreign companies, associations and institutions. https://www.hcch.net/en/instruments/conventions/full-text/?cid=36

11. Kamer van Koophandel en Fabrieken voor Amsterdam v. Inspire Art Ltd, C-167/01. (2003). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62001CJ0167

12. Kleshcheva, I. A. (2013). Unifikatsiya prava, reguliruyushchego voprosy priznaniya yuridicheskikh lits drugimi gosudarstvami [Unification of the law regulating issues of recognition of legal entities by other states]. Vestnik Saratovskoy gosudarstvennoy yuridicheskoy akademii [Bulletin of the Saratov State Law Academy], 5(94). https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/unifikatsiya-prava-reguliruyuschego-voprosy-priznaniya-yuridicheskih-lits-drugimi-gosudarstvami

13. Marko Mihaljevic v. Republic of Croatia, ARB/19/35. (2019). https://www.italaw.com/cases/10607

14. Pargendler, M. (2024). The new corporate law of corporate groups (Law Working Paper No. 702/2023). European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI). https://www.ecgi.global/publications/working-papers/the-new-corporate-law-of-corporate-groups

15. Peters, A. (Ed.). (2023). Recognition of foreign companies. In Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law. Oxford University Press.

Scott Morton, F., & Veugelers, R. (2025, December). Regime 0: Europe-wide incorporation for startups to kickstart innovative growth. Bruegel Policy Brief Issue n33/25. https://www.bruegel.org/policy-brief/regime-0-europe-wide-incorporation-startups-kickstart-innovative-growth

Überseering BV v. Nordic Construction Company Baumanagement GmbH (NCC), C-208/00. (2002). https://infocuria.curia.europa.eu/tabs/affair?lang=EN&sort=AFF_NUM-DESC&searchTerm=%22C-208%2F00%22&publishedId=C-208%2F00

16. Yumashev, Yu. M. (1988). Pravovoe regulirovanie pryamykh inostrannykh kapitalovlozheniy v EES [Legal regulation of foreign direct investment in the EEC]. Science.

17. Yusifova, R. T. (2018). Lichnyy zakon i natsionalnost yuridicheskogo litsa: ponyatie i sootnoshenie v sovremennom mezhdunarodnom chastnom prave [Personal law and nationality of a legal entity: concept and relationship in modern international private law] (Abstract of Candidate dissertation). MGIMO University.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-10