DIGITALIZATION AND USE OF MODERN TECHNOLOGIES IN THE FORENSIC SECTOR
Keywords:
digitalization, artificial intelligence, digital evidence, electronic databases, “E-expertise” electronic platform, digital forensics, electronic expertise, institutional reformsAbstract
The article presents a scientific analysis of reforms aimed at modernizing forensic activities in the Republic of Uzbekistan, their legal basis, the processes of digitalization of forensic activities, and the main problems in practice. In foreign countries, the digitalization of forensic activities is considered a priority area for the development of legal systems and an important factor in increasing the effectiveness of justice. This implies a transition from traditional paper circulation to electronic information systems and will lead to significant changes. The author scientifically substantiates that the development of the forensic expert system in harmony with global trends and the digitalization of activities is an important factor in increasing the effectiveness of justice. At the end of the study, he put forward his proposals for further improvement of this area.
Downloads
References
1. Abdurahmonov, I. I. (2021). Sud-ekspertlik faoliyatida zamonaviy texnologiyalar [Modern technologies in forensic activities] (pp. 112–130). Tashkent.
2. Carrier, B. (2019). Digital forensics investigation process (pp. 56–78, 143–160). Elsevier.
3. Casey, E. (2018). Digital evidence and computer crime (pp. 95–124, 201–220). Academic Press.
4. Council of Europe. (2019). Guidelines of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on electronic evidence in civil and administrative proceedings and explanatory memorandum. Council of Europe Publishing.
5. European Parliament & Council of the European Union. (2024). Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act). https://ai-act-law.eu
6. International Organization for Standardization. (2015a). Information technology — Security techniques — Guidance on assuring suitability and adequacy of incident investigation method (ISO/IEC Standard No. 27041:2015). https://www.iso.org/standard/44405.html
7. International Organization for Standardization. (2015b). Information technology — Security techniques — Guidelines for the analysis and interpretation of digital evidence (ISO/IEC Standard No. 27042:2015). https://www.iso.org/standard/44406.html
8. Japan National Police Agency. (2020). Digital forensics reports (pp. 22–45). National Police Agency.
9. Mirzayev, A., & Abdullayev, D. (2020). Sud-ekspertlik xulosalarining qonuniyligi va ishonchliligini oshirish mexanizmlari [Mechanisms for increasing the legality and reliability of forensic expert conclusions]. Scientific Application of Jurisprudence, (1), 12–21.
10. President of Uzbekistan. (2025). Presidential Decree No. RP–270 “On measures for further improving forensic expert activity and the wide introduction of modern technologies into the sphere”. https://lex.uz/uz/docs/7717938
11. Republic of Uzbekistan. (2003). Law “On informatization”. https://lex.uz/uz/docs/83472
12. Republic of Uzbekistan. (2010). Law “On the forensic examination”. https://lex.uz/uz/docs/1633102
13. Republic of Uzbekistan. (2015). Law “On the electronic government”. https://lex.uz/uz/docs/2833860
14. Republic of Uzbekistan. (2023). The Constitution of the Republic of Uzbekistan. https://lex.uz/uz/docs/-6445145
15. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2020). Handbook on digital forensics (pp. 33–58, 101–120). United Nations.
