A SCIENTIFIC MODEL FOR EXAMINING THE COMPLEXITY OF CORRUPTION NETWORKS

Authors

Keywords:

institutional integrity, policymaking process, administrative frameworks, bureaucratic structures, ethical failure

Abstract

This research presents the TASP framework, designed to analyze corruption through four dimensions – Types, Activities, Sectors, and Places. Further, it examines the multifaceted nature of corruption within the public sphere, emphasizing how such practices originate, how they can be effectively measured, and the risks they pose to institutional integrity. Rather than treating corruption solely as a matter of personal misconduct or legal violation, the study conceptualizes it as a systemic and cultural phenomenon embedded within political and administrative systems. By employing the TASP framework, incidents of both actual and suspected corruption can be assessed with greater precision, enabling the formulation of appropriate preventive and corrective measures aimed at transforming unethical practices and enhancing public sector performance. Moreover, the research contributes to identifying the specific patterns, locations, and contexts in which corruption occurs, thereby clarifying areas of heightened vulnerability. Drawing on empirical findings, it ultimately shows that categorizing and comprehending corrupt behaviors in detail is essential for the development of focused and effective anti-corruption policies on the whole.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Ahmadjonov Murodullo Nurali ugli

    Independent Researcher at Tashkent State University of Law, Assistant to the Prosecutor of Kosonsoy District, Namangan Region

References

Ahmadjonov, M. (2024). Anti-Corruption and Compliance Control: Legal Literacy among Lawyers and Law Students. International Journal of Law and Policy, 8, 52–67. https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.145

Ahmadjonov, M. (2025, March). The Impact of corruption factors in public administration. Review of law sciences, 9(11), 66–74. https://review.tsul.uz/2025/04/04/davlat-boshqaruviga-korrupsiyaviy-omillarning-tasiri/

AllahRakha, N. (2023). The impacts of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on business and its regulatory challenges. International Journal of Law and Policy, 1, 25–48. https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.23

AllahRakha, N. (2024). Global perspectives on cybercrime legislation. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 8, 106–131. https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i10.6007

Alkhodary, A., & Saidat, Z. (2023). Examining the Impact of E-Governance on the Performance of Corporations: A Case Study of Companies in Jordan. Information Sciences Letters, 26. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2021-7-5-235-242

Barrington, M. (2022). The Social Bases of Obedience and Revolt. International Journal of Law and Policy, 13, 22–35. https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.154

Carter, L. Y. (2023). Analyzing e-government design science artifacts: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Information Management, 11. 75–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt. 2021.102430D

Cardellini, L. (2023). Sovereignty beyond Borders: Unraveling the Enigma of Airspace and Outer Space Interplay. International Journal of Law and Policy, 9. https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.201

Fazekas, K. L. (2019). Perils of development funding: The tale of EU Funds and grand corruption in Central and Eastern Europe. Regulation and Governance, 17, 52–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.121

Huang, C., & Hsiao, L. (2022). Effect of Applying Case Method to Anti-Corruption Education on Learning Motivation and Learning Effectiveness. Revista de Cercetare Si Interventie Sociala, 23. https://doi.org/10.33788/rcis.73.17

Knowledgehub. (2019). Аnticоrruрtiоn Роliciеs in Gеоrgiа, Mоldоvа аnd Ukrаinе (pp. 28–35). httрs://knоwlеdgеhub.trаnsраrеncy.оrg/аssеts/uрlоаds/Аnti-cоrruрtiоnроliciеs

McAllister, J. & Pietsch, A. G. (2012). ANU poll: Perceptions of corruption and ethical conduct

(p. 7). http://politicsir.cass.anu.edu.au/polls-and-surveys/anupoll

OECD. (2023). Collusion and corruption in public procurement No. 6, pp. 103–117. https://www.oecd.org/daf/competition/46235884

Parliamentary Assembly. (2024). Promoting Integrity to Tackle Political Corruption No. 9

pp. 51–66. https://assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/XRef/Xref-XML2HTMLEN.aspfileid=23930

Salter, M. (2010). Lawful but corrupt: Gaming and the problem of institutional corruption in the private sector. Harvard Business School, 14. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1726004

Schachter, H. L. (2022). E‐participation Opportunities and the Ambiguous Role of Corruption: A Model of Municipal Responsiveness to Sociopolitical Factors. Public Administration Review, 79, 10–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13049

Yakovlev, E. Zh. (2023). State capture: From Yeltsin to Putin. CEFIR/NES Working Paper series Working Paper No. 942006. Centre for Economic and Financial Research at New Economic School, 2. http://www.cefir.ru/ezhuravskaya/research/Yakovlev_Zhuravskaya_Capture_Yeltsin_Putin.pdf

Downloads

Published

2026-01-08

Issue

Section

12.00.12 – Korrupsiya muammolari.