BANDLIK SOHASIDAGI OMMAVIY-HUQUQIY NIZOLARNI MA’MURIY SUDLARDA KO‘RIB CHIQISHNING O‘ZIGA XOS XUSUSIYATLARI
##semicolon##
bandlik organi, ommaviy-huquqiy nizo, ma’muriy hujjat, harakatsizlik, isbotlash majburiyati, sud nazorati, yurisdiksiya, ishsizlik nafaqasi##article.abstract##
Mazkur maqolada O‘zbekiston Respublikasida bandlik sohasida yuzaga keladigan ommaviy-huquqiy nizolarni ma’muriy sudlar tomonidan ko‘rib chiqishning o‘ziga xos xususiyatlari kompleks tarzda tahlil qilindi. Tadqiqot doirasida “Ma’muriy tartib-taomillar to‘g‘risida”gi Qonun, Ma’muriy sud ishlarini yuritish to‘g‘risidagi kodeks hamda “Aholi bandligi to‘g‘risida”gi Qonun normalari o‘zaro bog‘liqlikda o‘rganildi. Maqolada isbotlash yukining taqsimlanishi, ma’muriy hujjatlarni asoslantirish majburiyati va davlat organlarining harakatsizligi bilan bog‘liq muammolar sud amaliyoti asosida yoritildi. Shuningdek, Germaniya va Fransiya ma’muriy huquqi tajribasi qiyosiy-huquqiy jihatdan tahlil qilinib, ularning ilg‘or yondashuvlari aniqlashtirildi. Tadqiqot natijasida amaldagi qonunchilikni qo‘llashda yuzaga kelayotgan tizimli kamchiliklar ochib berilib, fuqarolarning huquq va qonuniy manfaatlarini samarali himoya qilishga qaratilgan ilmiy asoslangan takliflar ishlab chiqildi. Shuningdek, sudlar faoliyatida protsessual adolat tamoyillarini ta’minlash, davlat organlarining mas’uliyatini oshirish va raqamli xizmatlar sharoitida yuzaga kelayotgan yangi turdagi nizolarni huquqiy tartibga solish zarurati asoslab berildi.
##plugins.themes.default.displayStats.downloads##
##submission.citations##
Akramova, H. (2022, April 1). Qonunga itoatsizlik litsenziyaning sud tomonidan bekor qilinishiga asos bo‘ldi [Non-compliance with the law became grounds for judicial cancellation of a license]. Strength is in Justice, (15).
Cane, P. (2015). Records, reasons and rationality in judicial control of administrative power: England, the US and Australia. Israel Law Review, 48(3), 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002122371500014X
Craig, P. (2010). Proportionality, rationality and review. New Zealand Law Review, (2), 265–301.
Federal Republic of Germany. (1960, January 21). Code of Administrative Court Procedure (VwGO). Laws on the Internet. https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/vwgo/
Federal Republic of Germany. (1976, May 25). Administrative Procedure Act (VwVfG). Laws on the Internet. https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/vwvfg/
French Republic. (2000). Code de justice administrative [Code of Administrative Justice]. Légifrance. https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/id/LEGITEXT000006070933/
French Republic. (2015). Code des relations entre le public et l’administration [Code of relations between the public and the administration]. Légifrance. https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/id/LEGITEXT000031366350/
Harlow, C., & Rawlings, R. (2010). National administrative procedures in a European perspective: Pathways to a slow convergence. Italian Journal of Public Law, 2(2), 215–258.
Khamedov, I. A., Khvan, L. B., & Tsai, I. M. (2012). Administrativnoye pravo Respubliki Uzbekistan. Obshchaya chast [Administrative law of the Republic of Uzbekistan: General part]. Konsauditinform-Nashr.
Khojiyev, E. T., & Shayzakov, Sh. I. (2019). Ommaviy-huquqiy munosabatlardan kelib chiqadigan nizolarning mazmun-mohiyati va o‘ziga xos xususiyatlari [The essence and specific features of disputes arising from public-law relations]. Bulletin of the Academy of the Prosecutor General’s Office of the Republic of Uzbekistan, (4), 31–36.
Mashaw, J. L. (1974). The management side of due process: Some theoretical and litigation notes on the assurance of accuracy, fairness and timeliness in the adjudication of social welfare claims. Cornell Law Review, 59(5), 772–824.
Mengliyev, A., & Mamotov, M. (2021, February 12). Ishsizlik nafaqasi har bir xodimning mehnat huquqi kafolatidir [Unemployment benefits are a guarantee of every employee’s labor rights]. Strength is in Justice., (6).
Muratayev, S. A., Musayev, B. T., & Artikоv, D. R. (2020). Ma’muriy huquq va protsess [Administrative law and procedure]. TSUL Publ.
Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2019, December 24). On judicial practice in considering cases concerning appeals against decisions and actions (inaction) of administrative bodies and their officials (Resolution No. 24). Lex.uz. https://lex.uz/docs/-4711311
President of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2025, January 30). On additional measures to introduce modern mechanisms for the judicial protection of the rights of citizens and business entities (Resolution No. RP-33). Lex.uz. https://lex.uz/docs/-7350794
Republic of Uzbekistan. (2018a, January 25). Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan on Administrative proceedings. Lex.uz. https://lex.uz/docs/-3527353
Republic of Uzbekistan. (2018b, January 8). On administrative procedures (Law No. LRU-457).
Lex.uz. https://lex.uz/docs/-3492199
Republic of Uzbekistan. (2020, October 20). On employment of the population (Law No. LRU-642). Lex.uz. https://lex.uz/docs/-5055690
Republic of Uzbekistan. (2023, April 30). Constitution of the Republic of Uzbekistan. Lex.uz. https://lex.uz/docs/-6445145
Supreme Court of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2025, February 4). Information on cases arising from public-law relations considered by courts in 2024. https://sud.uz/news-2025-02-03-1/
Supreme Court of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2026, January 6). Information on cases arising from public-law relations considered by courts in 2025. https://sud.uz/news-2026-01-05-1/
