WHAT IS THE SCOPE OF FAIR AND EQUITABLE TREATMENT (FET) STANDARD, AND CAN IT BE AGREED THAT FET IS OVERLY BROAD STANDARD? CAN FAIR AND EQUITABLE TREATMENT (FET) STANDARD BE DISTINGUISHED FROM THE FULL-PROTECTION AND SECURITY (FPS) STANDARD?
##semicolon##
fair and equitable treatment (FET) and full protection and security (FPS).##article.abstract##
This paper explores the principles of fair and equitable treatment (FET) and full protection and security (FPS) within the context of international investment law. The analysis is structured into three distinct sections. The first section delves into the scope of the fair and equitable treatment standard, examining its significance and application in international investment agreements. The second section provides a comprehensive overview of the concept of full protection and security, its historical evolution, and its role in protecting investors. The final section investigates the relationship between fair and equitable treatment and full protection and security, highlighting their interconnectedness and how they collectively contribute to the protection of foreign investments.
##plugins.themes.default.displayStats.downloads##
##submission.citations##
1. Full-Protection and Security
2. Fаir and Equitable Treatment Stаndard in Internаtional Investment Law’, OECD Working Papers on International Investment, OECD Publishing.
3. Rudolf Dolzer & Christoph Schreuer, Principle of International Investment Law (2nd edn, Oxford University Press 2012)
4. MTD v Chile, Award, 25 May 2004.
5. GAMI V Mexico, Award, 15 November 2004.
6. Metalclad v Mexico, Award, 30 August 2000.
7. Maffezini v Spain, Award on the Merits, 13 November 2000.
8. Newcomb A. and Paradell L, Law and Practice od Investment Treaties: Standards of Treatment (Kluwer Law International 2009)
9. El Paso v Argentina, Award, 31 October 2011.
10. Pope & Talbot v Canada, Award on Damage, 31 May 2002.
11. The Fаir and Equitable Treatment Standard in International Investment Agreement.
12. LESI v Algeria, Award, 12 November 2008.
13. Occidental Exploration v. Ecuador, Award, 1 July 2004.
14. Rumeli v Kazakhstan, Award, 29 July 2008.
15. Rudolf Dolzer & Christoph Schreuer, Principle of Internationаl Investment Law (2nd edn, Oxford University Press 2012)
16. Oxus v Uzbekistan, Award, 15 December 2015.
17. FULL PROTECTION AND SECURITY STANDARD IN INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT LAW. Pravni Vjesnik, 35 (3-4), 35–62.
18.
