PECULIARITIES OF CONSIDERING PUBLIC LAW DISPUTES IN THE FIELD OF EMPLOYMENT IN ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS
Keywords:
employment authority, public law dispute, administrative act, inaction, burden of proof, judicial review, jurisdiction, unemployment benefitAbstract
This article comprehensively analyzes the specific characteristics of resolving public law disputes in the field of employment by administrative courts in the Republic of Uzbekistan. Within the framework of the research, the provisions of the Law “On Administrative Procedures,” the Code of Administrative Court Proceedings, and the Law “On Population Employment” were examined in interconnection. Based on judicial practice, the article highlights issues related to the burden of proof allocation, the obligation to substantiate administrative acts, and the inactivity of state bodies. Additionally, the experience of German and French administrative law was analyzed through a comparative legal approach, identifying their advanced practices. As a result of the study, systemic shortcomings in the application of current legislation were revealed, and scientifically grounded proposals aimed at effectively protecting the rights and legitimate interests of citizens were developed. Furthermore, the necessity of ensuring procedural justice principles in court activities, enhancing the accountability of state bodies, and legally regulating new types of disputes arising under digital services was substantiated.
Downloads
References
Akramova, H. (2022, April 1). Qonunga itoatsizlik litsenziyaning sud tomonidan bekor qilinishiga asos bo‘ldi [Non-compliance with the law became grounds for judicial cancellation of a license]. Strength is in Justice, (15).
Cane, P. (2015). Records, reasons and rationality in judicial control of administrative power: England, the US and Australia. Israel Law Review, 48(3), 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002122371500014X
Craig, P. (2010). Proportionality, rationality and review. New Zealand Law Review, (2), 265–301.
Federal Republic of Germany. (1960, January 21). Code of Administrative Court Procedure (VwGO). Laws on the Internet. https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/vwgo/
Federal Republic of Germany. (1976, May 25). Administrative Procedure Act (VwVfG). Laws on the Internet. https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/vwvfg/
French Republic. (2000). Code de justice administrative [Code of Administrative Justice]. Légifrance. https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/id/LEGITEXT000006070933/
French Republic. (2015). Code des relations entre le public et l’administration [Code of relations between the public and the administration]. Légifrance. https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/id/LEGITEXT000031366350/
Harlow, C., & Rawlings, R. (2010). National administrative procedures in a European perspective: Pathways to a slow convergence. Italian Journal of Public Law, 2(2), 215–258.
Khamedov, I. A., Khvan, L. B., & Tsai, I. M. (2012). Administrativnoye pravo Respubliki Uzbekistan. Obshchaya chast [Administrative law of the Republic of Uzbekistan: General part]. Konsauditinform-Nashr.
Khojiyev, E. T., & Shayzakov, Sh. I. (2019). Ommaviy-huquqiy munosabatlardan kelib chiqadigan nizolarning mazmun-mohiyati va o‘ziga xos xususiyatlari [The essence and specific features of disputes arising from public-law relations]. Bulletin of the Academy of the Prosecutor General’s Office of the Republic of Uzbekistan, (4), 31–36.
Mashaw, J. L. (1974). The management side of due process: Some theoretical and litigation notes on the assurance of accuracy, fairness and timeliness in the adjudication of social welfare claims. Cornell Law Review, 59(5), 772–824.
Mengliyev, A., & Mamotov, M. (2021, February 12). Ishsizlik nafaqasi har bir xodimning mehnat huquqi kafolatidir [Unemployment benefits are a guarantee of every employee’s labor rights]. Strength is in Justice., (6).
Muratayev, S. A., Musayev, B. T., & Artikоv, D. R. (2020). Ma’muriy huquq va protsess [Administrative law and procedure]. TSUL Publ.
Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2019, December 24). On judicial practice in considering cases concerning appeals against decisions and actions (inaction) of administrative bodies and their officials (Resolution No. 24). Lex.uz. https://lex.uz/docs/-4711311
President of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2025, January 30). On additional measures to introduce modern mechanisms for the judicial protection of the rights of citizens and business entities (Resolution No. RP-33). Lex.uz. https://lex.uz/docs/-7350794
Republic of Uzbekistan. (2018a, January 25). Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan on Administrative proceedings. Lex.uz. https://lex.uz/docs/-3527353
Republic of Uzbekistan. (2018b, January 8). On administrative procedures (Law No. LRU-457).
Lex.uz. https://lex.uz/docs/-3492199
Republic of Uzbekistan. (2020, October 20). On employment of the population (Law No. LRU-642). Lex.uz. https://lex.uz/docs/-5055690
Republic of Uzbekistan. (2023, April 30). Constitution of the Republic of Uzbekistan. Lex.uz. https://lex.uz/docs/-6445145
Supreme Court of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2025, February 4). Information on cases arising from public-law relations considered by courts in 2024. https://sud.uz/news-2025-02-03-1/
Supreme Court of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2026, January 6). Information on cases arising from public-law relations considered by courts in 2025. https://sud.uz/news-2026-01-05-1/
