РАҚАМЛИ АКТИВЛАР БИЛАН БОҒЛИҚ МУНОСАБАТЛАРНИ ФУҚАРОЛИК-ҲУҚУҚИЙ ТАРТИБГА СОЛИШ МАСАЛАСИДА ХОРИЖИЙ МАМЛАКАТЛАР ТАЖРИБАСИ
Keywords:
FinTech, рақамли молия, рақамли хизматлар, рақамли активAbstract
Мазкур мақола орқали фуқаролик-ҳуқуқий муомилада вужудга келган ўзига хос рақамли муносабатларни ҳуқуқий тартибга солишда мавжуд ижтимоий эҳтиёжлар ҳамда бу борада ечимини кутаётган масалаларни эътиборга олган ҳолда рақамли активлар оид илмий қарашлар ва назарий масалалар таҳлил объекти сифатида ўрганилади. Мақолада ривожланган хорижий мамлакатлардв рақамли активларнинг фуқаролик-ҳуқуқий муносабатлар объекти сифатида ўрганилганлиги, унинг ҳуқуқий табиати ва тартибга солиш усуллари қисқача илмий таҳлил этилган. Шунингдек, ушбу мақолада муаллиф рақамли активлар билан боғлиқ хорижий мамлакатлар тажрибасини тахлил қилар экан, унда суд амалиётидан мисоллар келтириб, келажакда мавжуд қонунчилик олдида ечимини кутаётган масалаларга эътибор қаратади. Мазкур мақола орқали ўқувчида рақамли молиявий технологиялар ёрдамида муомила бўлган рақамли активлар тўғрисида ҳамда унинг FinTech доирасида амалда бўлиш чегаралари ҳақидаги қарашларини бойитишга ёрдам беради.
Downloads
References
1. А.Р.Пўлатов. Криптавалюта ва токенлар айланмасини ҳуқуқий тартибга солиниши // Юpидик фaнлap бўйича фалсафа дoктopи (PhD) диccеpтaция автореферати. –Тошкент, 2024. 24-б.
2. Jonathan R.Karlsen. How Much Illegal Activity is financed through Crypto currencies? (December 14, 2018). Review of Financial Studies, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com
3. FATF Report Virtual Currencies Key Definitions and Potential AML/CFT Risks, June 2014. –P.4.
4. Криптовалюты и блокчейн как атрибуты новой экономики. Евразийская экономическая комиссия. –М.: 2019. –С.69-71.
5. Hatim Hussain, Michel Rauchs, Rasheed Saleuddin. Global Cryptoasset Regulatory Landscape Study // Cambridge Center for Alternative Finance, https://www.jbs.cam.ac.uk
6. FATF (2012–2019), International Standards on Combating Money Laundering and the Financing of Terrorism & Proliferation, FATF, Paris, France. –P. 15: www.fatf-gafi.org
7. Communiqué G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors Meeting Fukuoka, Japan, June 9, 2019. Para. 13: http://www.g20.utoronto.ca
8. FATF (2012-2019), International Standards on Combating Money Laundering and the Financing of Terrorism & Proliferation, FATF, Paris, France. –P.70.
9. Financial Stability Board, Crypto-asset markets Potential channels for future financial stability implications 10 October 2018 https://www.fsb.org
10. Financial Stability Board, Crypto-asset markets Potential channels for future financial stability implications 10 October 2018 https://www.fsb.org
11. International Organization Of Securities Commissions, Issues, Risks and Regulatory Considerations Relating to Crypto-Asset Trading Platforms, Consultation Report, CR02/2019, May 2019: https://www.iosco.org
12. IOSCO сайти. https://www.iosco.org/publications/?subsection=ico-statements
13. Piergiorgio Valente. Bitcoin and Virtual Currencies Are Real: Are the Regulators Still Virtual? INTERTAX, Volume 46, Issue 6 & 7, 2018. –P.544.
14. European Banking Authority Report, 9 January 2019. Report with advice for the European Commission on cryproassets. –P.4. https://eba.europa.eu
15. European Central Bank, Crypto-Assets: Implications for financial stability, monetary policy, and payments and market infrastructures, No 223, May 2019. –P.3. https://www.ecb.europa.eu
16. ESMA Advice, Initial Coin Offerings and Crypto-Assets, 9 Junuary 2019, ESMA50-157-1391. https://www.esma.europa.eu
17. Judgment of the Court of 22 October 2015 Skatteverket v David Hedqvist, Case C-264/14, Published in the electronic Reports of Cases, ECLI:EU:C:2015:718.
18. Judgment of the Court of 22 October 2015 Skatteverket v David Hedqvist. Paras. –Р. 54.
19. Kollmann, J. The VAT Treatment of Cryptocurrencies, EC Tax Review 2019-3. –P.170.
20. Directive (EU) 2018/843 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2018 amending Directive (EU) 2015/849 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing, and amending Directives 2009/138/EC and 2013/36/EU, Art. 3 (18) (19) // OJL 156, 19.6.2018. –Р.74.
21. Expert Group on Regulatory Obstacles to Financial Innovation (ROFIEG), 30 Recommendations On Regulation, Innovation And Finance, Final Report to the European Commission December 2019. –P.23.
22. Reuters, Japan’s ruling party says won’t regulate Bitcoin for now (19 June 2014), www.reuters.com
23. Reuters, The Coincheck cryptocurrency hack: everything you need to know (29 January 2018), available at: http://fortune.com/2018/01/29/coincheck-japan-nem-hack/.
24. See Takero Minami and Keita Sekiguchi, Japan’s Coincheck to gain license after $500m hack, Nikkei Asian Review (19 December 2018), available at: https://asia.nikkei.com/Spotlight/Bitcoin-evolution/Japan-s-Coincheck-to-gain-license-after-500m-hack.
25. Turdialiev, M. A. P. U. (2023). SOME SCIENTIFIC THEORETICAL DISCUSSIONS ON THE LEGAL REGULATIONS OF THE METAVERSE. Oriental renais-sance: Innovative, educational, natural and social sciences, 3(8), 298-307.
26. Pramesthi, Q. E., Ogli, T. M. A. P., & Febriani, H. (2024). Review of Judges' Consideration in the Court De-cision Regarding the Illegal Sale of Subsidized Fertilizer: Comparison of Indonesian and Uzbekistan. Jurnal Juris-prudence, 117-136.
